Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] system_data_types.7: ffix

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Alex, Branden,
On 9/30/20 11:32 PM, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> Hi Branden & Michael,
> 
> On 2020-09-30 12:43, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
>  >> However, if using .br is a big headache, I would rather not use
>  >> workarounds (as you proposed in an earlier email),
>  >> and instead just live with the blank line.  It's not much of a
>  >> problem.
>  >
>  > Was an actual decision taken on this?  I see patches continuing to roll
>  > in containing this .br-based pattern.  I think if the extra line is
>  > live-withable, it should be lived with (or one of my four proposed
>  > alternatives could be used :) ), in preference to setting the bad
>  > example of the "naked" .br requests.
> 
> No decision yet.
> We continued with the patch,
> considering that we might revert it
> or change it to a different approach in the future.

Yes. I figure we can easily clean up the inconsistency later.

> Actually I thought Michael would have hold the patches until the decision,

I didn't want to slow you down,...

> but he merged them, and it may be easier this way...
> we'll fix it when we decide.

Yes.

> For me, I can live with the extra blank line.
> Michael, what are your thoughts?

I can live with it too.

[...]


> 
>  >
>  > Regards,
>  > Branden
>  >
>  > [1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/groff/2019-03/msg00047.html
>  > [2] 
> https://gitlab.com/procps-ng/procps/blob/7ac9a0e1f5606696dc799b773d5ec70183ca91a3/ps/ps.1
>  >
> 
> 
> I was writing about the different options and testing them,
> when by accident I discovered that .RS alone, which I introduced lately,
> already fixed the problem we had in the beginning:
> .RS forces a line break after the tag
> (so .br is actually redundant right now).
> 
> I guess we'll all be happy with just .RS, right? :-}

I think so.

Cheers,

Michael

PS Alex, I believe we are at a sync point right now (i.e., I think
that I do not have any unprocessed patches from you). Let me know if
I'm wrong.

-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux