Hi Alex, On 9/11/20 11:39 AM, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > Hi Michael, [...] >> So, I'm in a little bit of doubt about patches 01 and 02. Does >> this really win us anything? On the one hand, %"PRIx32" is more >> difficult to read than %x. On the other, does it win us anything >> in terms of portability? At first glance, the answers seems to me >> to be "no". Your thoughts? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Michael > > On 16-bit systems 'unsigned int' might be shorter than 'uint32_t'. > There it would make a difference, I guess. I guess. But even un the 80s, when (I think) htonl() appeared, I kind of doubt that there were many such systems. I think I'll skip these patches. Thanks, Michael -- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
