Hi Alex,
On 9/10/20 11:13 PM, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <colomar.6.4.3@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> man3/inet_net_pton.3 | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/man3/inet_net_pton.3 b/man3/inet_net_pton.3
> index 00f94b9d4..d74a33d74 100644
> --- a/man3/inet_net_pton.3
> +++ b/man3/inet_net_pton.3
> @@ -332,6 +332,7 @@ Raw address: c1a80180
> /* Link with "\-lresolv" */
>
> #include <arpa/inet.h>
> +#include <inttypes.h>
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <stdlib.h>
>
> @@ -381,7 +382,7 @@ main(int argc, char *argv[])
> may not have been touched by inet_net_ntop(), and so will still
> have any initial value that was specified in argv[2]. */
>
> - printf("Raw address: %x\en", htonl(addr.s_addr));
> + printf("Raw address: %"PRIx32"\en", htonl(addr.s_addr));
>
> exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
> }
So, I'm in a little bit of doubt about patches 01 and 02. Does
this really win us anything? On the one hand, %"PRIx32" is more
difficult to read than %x. On the other, does it win us anything
in terms of portability? At first glance, the answers seems to me
to be "no". Your thoughts?
Thanks,
Michael
--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
