Re: Errors in man pages, here: wprintf(3): Wording

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/19/20 8:48 AM, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> Dear manpages maintainers.
> the manpage-l10n project maintains a large number of translations of
> man pages both from a large variety of sources (including manpages) as
> well for a large variety of target languages.
> 
> During their work translators notice different possible issues in the
> original (english) man pages. Sometiems this is a straightforward
> typo, sometimes a hard to read sentence, sometimes this is a convention
> not held up and sometimes we simply do not understand the original.
> 
> We use several distributions as sources and update regularly (at
> least every 2 month). This means we are fairly recent (some
> distributions like archlinux also update frequently) but might miss
> the latest upstream version once a while, so the error might be
> already fixed. We apologize and ask you to close the issue immediately
> if this should be the case, but given the huge volume of projects and
> the very limited number of volunteers we are not able to double check
> each and every issue.
> 
> Secondly we translators see the manpages in the neutral po format,
> i.e. converted and harmonized, but not the original source (be it man,
> groff, xml or other). So we cannot provide a true patch (where
> possible), but only an approximation which you need to translate into
> your source format.
> 
> Finally the issues I'm reporting have accumulated over time and are
> not always discovered by me, so sometimes my description of the
> problem my be a bit limited - do not hesitate to ask so we can clarify
> them.
> 
> I'm now reporting the errors for your project. As requested, each
> issue is sent in an unique mail for easier tracking on your side. If
> future reports should use another channel, please let me know.
> 
> **
> 
> The text in the bracket in the 2nd sentence is difficult to understand

I need a bit more elaboration here.

Thanks,

Michael

> "If no B<l> modifier is present: the I<const\\ char\\ *> argument is expected "
> "to be a pointer to an array of character type (pointer to a string) "
> "containing a multibyte character sequence beginning in the initial shift "
> "state.  Characters from the array are converted to wide characters (each by "
> "a call to the B<mbrtowc>(3)  function with a conversion state starting in "
> "the initial state before the first byte).  The resulting wide characters are "
> "written up to (but not including) the terminating null wide character (L\\(aq"
> "\\e0\\(aq).  If a precision is specified, no more wide characters than the "
> "number specified are written.  Note that the precision determines the number "
> "of I<wide characters> written, not the number of I<bytes> or I<screen "
> "positions>.  The array must contain a terminating null byte (\\(aq"
> "\\e0\\(aq), unless a precision is given and it is so small that the number "
> "of converted wide characters reaches it before the end of the array is "
> "reached.  If an B<l> modifier is present: the I<const\\ wchar_t\\ *> "
> "argument is expected to be a pointer to an array of wide characters.  Wide "
> "characters from the array are written up to (but not including) a "
> "terminating null wide character.  If a precision is specified, no more than "
> "the number specified are written.  The array must contain a terminating null "
> "wide character, unless a precision is given and it is smaller than or equal "
> "to the number of wide characters in the array."
> 


-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux