> -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Kerrisk (man-opages) [mailto:mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 2:11 AM > To: Don Brace <don.brace@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; G. Branden Robinson > <g.branden.robinson@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxx; linux-man@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Gerry Morong > <gerry.morong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; John Hall <John.Hall@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; > Kevin Barnett <kevin.barnett@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Bader Ali - Saleh > <bader.alisaleh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Scott Teel <scott.teel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; > Justin Lindley <justin.lindley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Scott Benesh > <scott.benesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] smartpqi: initial submit of smartpqi man page > > EXTERNAL EMAIL > > > Hello Don, > > On 10/21/2017 12:10 AM, Don Brace wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: G. Branden Robinson [mailto:g.branden.robinson@xxxxxxxxx] > >> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 4:36 PM > >> To: Don Brace <don.brace@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Cc: mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxx; linux-man@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Gerry Morong > >> <gerry.morong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; John Hall <John.Hall@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; > >> Kevin Barnett <kevin.barnett@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Bader Ali - Saleh > >> <bader.alisaleh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Scott Teel <scott.teel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; > >> Justin Lindley <justin.lindley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Scott Benesh > >> <scott.benesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] smartpqi: initial submit of smartpqi man page > >> > >> At 2017-10-18T10:10:39-0500, Don Brace wrote: > >>> This patch contains the initial submission of the > >>> smartpqi man page. > >> > >> Hi Don, > >> > >> Please find attached my recommended changes. > >> > >> I made many changes, most of them formatting-related. > > > > Really appreciate your effort! > > My apologies for not weighing in sooner. I see you got a lot of input > from Branden! (Thanks, Branden!) How shall we move forward? Possibilities: > > 1. I apply your original patch as is. > 2. You rework your patch incorporating those changes from Branden > that seem uncontroversial to you, and I apply, and then we > discuss any further changes that may be needed. > 3. If all changes from Branden seem uncontroversial, I apply\ > your patch, his patch, and then we discuss any further changes > that may be needed. > > I suspect 2 or 3 is the way to go, but I await your input. > > Thanks, > > Michael I like option #3. ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{��f��)�� jg��� �����ݢj����G���� ���j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥
