RE: [PATCH] smartpqi: initial submit of smartpqi man page

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: G. Branden Robinson [mailto:g.branden.robinson@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 4:36 PM
> To: Don Brace <don.brace@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxx; linux-man@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Gerry Morong
> <gerry.morong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; John Hall <John.Hall@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> Kevin Barnett <kevin.barnett@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Bader Ali - Saleh
> <bader.alisaleh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Scott Teel <scott.teel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> Justin Lindley <justin.lindley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Scott Benesh
> <scott.benesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] smartpqi: initial submit of smartpqi man page
> 
> At 2017-10-18T10:10:39-0500, Don Brace wrote:
> > This patch contains the initial submission of the
> > smartpqi man page.
> 
> Hi Don,
> 
> Please find attached my recommended changes.
> 
> I made many changes, most of them formatting-related.

Really appreciate your effort!

> 
> There are some issues I was unsure about; I left them in comments:
> 
> To configure Microsemi Smart Family controllers, please refer to the
> controller's User Guide documentation.
> .\" Does this manual have a title?  Is it freely available online?
> .\" Does it have a stable URL?  Can this information be moved to the SEE
> .\" ALSO section?

There is currently no User Guide available on-line. The guide should be packaged with
the controller. There is a Documentation/scsi/smartpqi.txt  entry.

> 
> .\" What is "ioaccel"?  This string appears nowhere in man-pages HEAD.
This is a term for RAID volumes. When an I/O request can go directly to a physical disk
bypassing the RAID engine in the controller. This results in a performance gain.

> 
> .\" This example line is too wide for an 80-column TTY.
> .B cat /sys/class/scsi_disk/1:0:3:0/device/ssd_smart_path_enabled
How about:
cd /sys/class/scsi_disk/1:0:3:0/device/
cat ssd_smart_path_enabled
> 
> .SS Supported \f[BI]ioctl\fP\/() operations
> .\" Does this subsection belong here, under .SH FILES ?
I see your point. This should be in a different section. We saw that hpsa.4 had
done the same thing.

Should this be under NOTES?

> 
> And here's one more I just thought of (forest, trees...).
> 
> Is "SmartPQI" the correct casing when referring to the product rather
> than the kernel module?

The driver name is smartpqi, perhaps omitting the SmartPQI or SMARTPQI would be best
for these sections.
> 
> I checked the output on 80- and 191-column terminals and with a
> PostScript viewer.
> 
> [1] And which doesn't "work everywhere", anyway, for instance on EBCDIC
> systems.  IIRC, the groff guys discourage defining a string escape this
> way.
> [2] I don't know of another term for this.  "In subsection ("SS")
>     headings, capitalize the first word in the heading, but otherwise
>     use lowercase, except where English usage (e.g., proper nouns) or
>     programming language requirements (e.g., identifier names) dictate
>     otherwise."
> [3] MTK: Is this a candidate for the "Preferred terms" subsection of
>     man-pages(7)?
> 
> --
> Regards,
> Branden
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux