[PATCH] Describe race of direct read and fork for unaligned buffers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a long standing problem (or a surprising feature) in our implementation
of get_user_pages() (used by direct IO). Since several attempts to fix it
failed (e.g.
http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Kernel/2009-04/msg06542.html, or
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0903.1/01498.html refused in
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mm/31569) and it's not completely
clear whether we really want to fix it given the costs, let's at least document
it.

CC: mgorman@xxxxxxx
CC: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
---

--- a/man2/open.2	2012-04-27 00:07:51.736883092 +0200
+++ b/man2/open.2	2012-04-27 00:29:59.489892980 +0200
@@ -769,7 +769,12 @@
 and the file offset must all be multiples of the logical block size
 of the file system.
 Under Linux 2.6, alignment to 512-byte boundaries
-suffices.
+suffices. However, if the user buffer is not page aligned and direct read
+runs in parallel with a
+.BR fork (2)
+of the reader process, it may happen that the read data is split between
+pages owned by the original process and its child. Thus effectively read
+data is corrupted.
 .LP
 The
 .B O_DIRECT
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux