https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42704 Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxx --- Comment #1 from Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxx> 2012-04-17 19:03:47 --- Vasiliy, Thanks for raising this bug. I think the best approach would be to leave the existing EAGAIN text in the set*uid pages (possibly with a note about v3.1 changes), and add some text to the execve.2 page. However, I have a question: I can understand adding the check to execve(), but why was it removed from set*uid()? Surely it was still useful to applications that actually do check the return status from set*uid()? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
