On 04/05/2012 04:10 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
Well.. there are some back-incompatibilities here. prctl(PR_SET_TIMERSLACK, -1) used to restore current's slack setting to whatever-we-inherited-at-fork, but that has been removed. What are the implications of this, and did we need to do it?
It seems you're looking at the previous version of this patch (http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/20/55). Latest proposal is http://lwn.net/Articles/484162/, which defines PR_SET_TIMERSLACK action as: ... case PR_SET_TIMERSLACK: if (arg2 <= 0) current->timer_slack_ns = default_timer_slack_ns; else if (arg2 <= HRTIMER_MAX_SLACK) current->timer_slack_ns = arg2; else error = -EINVAL; break; ...
If we do make changes in this area then the prctl manpage should be updated, please. And if http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-man/msg01149.html represents the current state of that manpage then it should be updated anyway - that entry doesn't say anything about the (arg2<= 0) case.
I sent a patch for man pages too, it should be one of the recent posts at http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-man/index.html. Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
