On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 07:42:49 +1300 "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) > <mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 4:43 AM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@xxxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > >> Michael: should i fold in the updates that came from this thread > >> and send a v2, or are you going to tackle it ? > > > > I'll work on a draft, and have it out for review in a few days. > > Mike, Chris, > > Here's a heavily edited version of the page that Mike sent in. Since I > might have messed something up, could I ask you two to take a good > look at this page? > .... > > The > .BR process_vm_readv () > system call transfers data from the process > .I pid > to the calling process. > The data to be transferred is identified by > .IR remote_vec Just a typo, but I think you mean remote_iov here instead of remote_vec (it occurs in a few places below as well). There's some cases of local_vec instead of local_iov too. Regards, Chris -- cyeoh@xxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
