On 20 October 2011 13:26, Mike Frysinger <vapier@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thursday 20 October 2011 14:17:39 Reuben Thomas wrote: >> On 20 October 2011 13:08, Mike Frysinger <vapier@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Thursday 20 October 2011 03:04:12 Jonathan Nieder wrote: >> >> +.RB \*(lq /lib/ld-linux.so.* >> >> +.RI [ options ] >> >> +.I program >> >> +.RI [ arguments ]\*(rq. >> > >> > can we avoid lq/rq ? it's pretty uncommon and imo, just useless noise. >> >> Au contraire, proper quotation marks make man pages more readable; to >> be encouraged. > > sorry, my point was lq/rq vs "", not lq/rq vs nothing ... In that case I retract my retraction: I'd much rather have curly quotes. They're more readable and they make it easier to tell when quotes are part of input/output (in which case they're straight). -- http://rrt.sc3d.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
