On Thursday 20 October 2011 14:17:39 Reuben Thomas wrote: > On 20 October 2011 13:08, Mike Frysinger <vapier@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thursday 20 October 2011 03:04:12 Jonathan Nieder wrote: > >> +.RB \*(lq /lib/ld-linux.so.* > >> +.RI [ options ] > >> +.I program > >> +.RI [ arguments ]\*(rq. > > > > can we avoid lq/rq ? it's pretty uncommon and imo, just useless noise. > > Au contraire, proper quotation marks make man pages more readable; to > be encouraged. sorry, my point was lq/rq vs "", not lq/rq vs nothing ... -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
