Re: [PATCH] kexec_load manpage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 02:25:40PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 09:14:17PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 11:38:02PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 04:56:24PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> > > > Hey Andi,
> > > > 
> > > > I'd like to push this page out the door, but I'm blocked doing so
> > > > until I hear back from you regarding the question below (plus a new
> > > > version of the page, if needed please).
> > > 
> > > Probably. Eric should know.
> > > 
> > > Frankly without an header the syscall is pretty much unusable
> > > for normal programs anyways, so I gave up on this.
> > 
> > I'm not sure that I ever understood the impasse over the header.
> 
> It's basically: should kexec_load only be used from kexec(8)
> or is it a generally available syscall.
> 
> If the former is true no header or manpage is needed.
> For the later both are.

Magnus Damm is interested in having a kexec-tools module for busybox [1].
And I suspect that would be somewhat less tedious to implement
if kexec was a generally available syscall.

[1] http://tree.celinuxforum.org/pipermail/celinux-dev/2010-October/002057.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux