Re: Doubts with sysfs(2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Denis,

On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Denis Barbier <bouzim@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2010/6/27 Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> [...]
>> --- a/man2/sysfs.2
>> +++ b/man2/sysfs.2
>> @@ -90,12 +90,12 @@ is invalid.
>>  .SH "CONFORMING TO"
>>  SVr4.
>>  .SH NOTES
>> -On Linux with the
>> -.I proc
>> -file system mounted on
>> +This System-V derived system call is obsolete; don't use it.
>> +On systems with
>>  .IR /proc ,
>> -the same information can be derived from
>> -.IR /proc/filesystems .
>> +the the same information can be obtained via
>
> Hello Michael,
>
> There is an extra 'the' just above, found in commit d1d721be.
>
> Denis

Thanks. Fixed.

Cheers,

Michael


-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Author of "The Linux Programming Interface" http://blog.man7.org/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux