Re: Doubts with sysfs(2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2010/6/27 Michael Kerrisk wrote:
[...]
> --- a/man2/sysfs.2
> +++ b/man2/sysfs.2
> @@ -90,12 +90,12 @@ is invalid.
>  .SH "CONFORMING TO"
>  SVr4.
>  .SH NOTES
> -On Linux with the
> -.I proc
> -file system mounted on
> +This System-V derived system call is obsolete; don't use it.
> +On systems with
>  .IR /proc ,
> -the same information can be derived from
> -.IR /proc/filesystems .
> +the the same information can be obtained via

Hello Michael,

There is an extra 'the' just above, found in commit d1d721be.

Denis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux