On Sunday 26 October 2008, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 04:22:46AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > it's the "updated" part that's the rub. stock glibc has an ancient > > queue.h while we've been updating it in Gentoo. i thought i checked and > > found that man-pages simply didnt have one, but it's more a matter of it > > being old. > > When I imported queue.h it matches what was in glibc back then. I tried > updating queue.h in glibc around the same time, but Uli doesn't like it. yeah, it should get updated or punted already. > Updating the man page to reflected some distro fork of the header > doesn't seem like a good idea. i wasnt suggesting we do that. i was explaining why i started this thread in the first place. > And at least five year ago all the maintained BSDs actually had quite > different additions to queue.h, so which one to pick would be rather > hard and I at least partially understand Uli's rejection. meh, having an outdated one is just as bad i think. -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
