Re: PR_SET_SECCOMP and PR_GET_SECCOMP doc (and bug?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 03:32:29PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> even the status quo is fine, as long as it's documented.  My only
> doubt was that the status quo is a little "strange" so I wondered

I agree it's a little strange ;).

> whether there might have been some mistake.  Anyway, if you do decide
> to change something here, please CC me.

Sure!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux