On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 12:12:14PM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote: > On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:32:29 +0200, Michael Kerrisk said: > > On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 02:15:13PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk wrote: > > > >> PR_GET_SECCOMP (since Linux 2.6.23) > > >> Return the secure computing mode of the calling thread. > > >> Not very useful: if the caller is not in secure computing > > >> mode, this operation returns 0; if the caller is in secure > > >> computing mode, then the prctl() call will cause a SIGKILL > > >> signal to be sent to the process. This operation is only > > >> available if the kernel is configured with CONFIG_SECCOMP > > >> enabled. > > Would it make sense to change the text to read "Not very useful for the > current implementation of mode=1" and/or add that it may be useful for Yes, makes sense to me ;). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
