Re: [PATCH] slab: Fix too strict alignment check in create_cache()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 1:23 AM Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 22/11/24 04:30, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Do we really need to continue supporting nommu machines ? Is anyone
but me even boot testing those ?

Yes. Across many architectures. And yes on every release, and for m68k building
and testing on every rc for nommu at a minimum.

I rarely hit build or testing problems on nonmmu targets. At least every kernel
release I build and test armnommu (including thumb2 on cortex), m68k, RISC-V and
xtensa. They are all easy, qemu targets for them all. Thats just me. So I would
guess there are others building and testing too.

FTR, I do regular boot tests on K210 (SiPEED MAiX BiT RISC-V nommu).
Getting harder, as 8 MiB of RAM is not much...

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds





[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux S/390]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux