On 9/24/24 00:48, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Hi David,
On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 9:34 AM David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 24.09.24 01:56, Guenter Roeck wrote:
v2: Instead of trying to make SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS depend on the
existence of NR_CPUS, define NR_CPUS for m68k.
Okay, looks like we're cleaning up CONFIG_NR_CPUS for good.
I'm back from conference travel tomorrow; I'll then throw in the following
into cross compilers and fixup any other arch that needs attention:
diff --git a/include/linux/threads.h b/include/linux/threads.h
index 1674a471b0b4..e31715e6746b 100644
--- a/include/linux/threads.h
+++ b/include/linux/threads.h
@@ -13,8 +13,7 @@
* bit of memory. Use nr_cpu_ids instead of this except for static bitmaps.
*/
#ifndef CONFIG_NR_CPUS
-/* FIXME: This should be fixed in the arch's Kconfig */
-#define CONFIG_NR_CPUS 1
+#error "CONFIG_NR_CPUS not defined"
#endif
/* Places which use this should consider cpumask_var_t. */
This is gonna trigger on almost all architectures if CONFIG_SMP=n.
Guess that means that my patch won't work either. Any better ideas ?
Guenter
