On Mon, 5 Feb 2024, Vincent MAILHOL wrote:
On Mon. 5 Feb. 2024 at 18:48, Finn Thain <fthain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 5 Feb 2024, Vincent MAILHOL wrote:
If clang support is important then clang's builtins are important. So
why not improve those instead? That would resolve the issue in a
win-win.
I am deeply sorry, but with all your respect, this request is unfair. I
will not fix the compiler.
Absolutely. It is unfair. Just as your proposal was unfair to maintainers.
That patch would make a compiler deficiency into a maintenance burden.
