Hi!
My 2 cents. I'm working on refactoring growfiles test which uses UCLINUX
flag.
During its development I had occasion to check UCLINUX support and
(indeed) it seems pretty
broken for LTP, because nobody is maintaining it for a while and such
tests use old API that will
be replaced in any case sooner or later. I agree with other people about
removing it, unless there's
a valid reason to keep it.
Just in case we want to keep it, someone should take care about UCLINUX
support, testing LTP releases for it as well, but it doesn't seem like
something we can do inside the LTP devs team due to the lack of resources.
Regards,
Andrea
On 1/5/24 04:52, Rob Landley wrote:
On 1/3/24 06:09, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
Hi!
I am not sure I agree with this series.
Removing support for UCLINUX from LTP is almost a guarantee for
not noticing when more breakage is introduced.
How exactly is UCLINUX broken in LTP?
As far as we know noone is using it and nobody is maintaing it for a
decade,
Nobody is maintaining "uclinux" because that was a distro, but you can build
nommu support in buildroot and such, and people do.
Rob
