Hi Petr,
On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 12:50 PM Petr Vorel <pvorel@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 2:52 AM Petr Vorel <pvorel@xxxxxxx> wrote:
UCLINUX is broken in LTP and nobody really cares. Actually I dare to
say UCLINUX is dead. Therefore I prepared patchset to remove UCLINUX
from LTP. We have been actively removing UCLINUX from LTP during rewrite
tests to new LTP API. This removes the rest from the old tests (which
will be sooner or later rewritten to new API).
Because the patchset is quite big, I did not want to send it to mailing
lists (but I can do it if you want).
Can you please have look at my fork on gitlab, branch: remove-UCLINUX
https://gitlab.com/pevik/ltp/-/commits/remove-UCLINUX?ref_type=heads
Build test:
https://github.com/pevik/ltp/actions/runs/7392470215
Thanks for your series!
Thank you for your feedback. May I add your Acked-by: tag to the series when we
agree to merge?
I am not sure I agree with this series.
Removing support for UCLINUX from LTP is almost a guarantee for
not noticing when more breakage is introduced.
How exactly is UCLINUX broken in LTP?
Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
