28.10.2021 14:00, Andy Shevchenko пишет:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 12:16:33AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
Add atomic/blocking_notifier_has_unique_priority() helpers which return
true if given handler has unique priority.
...
+/**
+ * atomic_notifier_has_unique_priority - Checks whether notifier's priority is unique
+ * @nh: Pointer to head of the atomic notifier chain
+ * @n: Entry in notifier chain to check
+ *
+ * Checks whether there is another notifier in the chain with the same priority.
+ * Must be called in process context.
+ *
+ * Returns true if priority is unique, false otherwise.
Why this indentation?
This is the same doc-comment style used by this file in general. I
haven't tried to invent anything new.
...
+ /*
+ * This code gets used during boot-up, when task switching is
+ * not yet working and interrupts must remain disabled. At
One space is enough.
This comment is replicated multiple times over this source file. You can
find it before each down_write(). I borrowed the text as-is, for
consistency.
