Hi Geert,
Am 26.06.2021 um 06:42 schrieb Michael Schmitz:
Hi Geert,
Am 25.06.2021 um 19:31 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven:
Hi Michael,
On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 11:20 PM Michael Schmitz
<schmitzmic@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 23/06/21 7:35 pm, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
BTW, there was also "[PATCH] [WIP] selftests/seccomp: Add m68k support"
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-m68k/alpine.DEB.2.21.2008261315050.25325@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
I kept on up-porting it, but haven't exercised it recently.
See attached for test results on my ARAnyM image (Laurent's qemu image,
essentially).
Is that any different from what you got in your earlier tests?
Fortunately lore has a better memory than I do ;-)
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-m68k/alpine.DEB.2.21.2008261612360.2926@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
mine: FAILED: 35 / 86 tests passed
yours: FAILED: 35 / 87 tests passed
So one new test, and it fails?
Looks like it. I must be missing some mail in my mail archive, can't
recall ever seeing that one.
There's one new test added after your mail was sent - KILL_unknown. I
suppose it's that one.
Anyway, both much better than without seccomp support. And going back
over the archive, I found your patch where you added seccomp.h - and
added a line in Kbuild as well, which I forgot. Will fix that.
Hmm - after that change, I get:
SYSHDR arch/m68k/include/generated/uapi/asm/unistd_32.h
SYSTBL arch/m68k/include/generated/asm/syscall_table.h
UPD include/config/kernel.release
scripts/Makefile.asm-generic:25: redundant generic-y found in
arch/m68k/include/asm/Kbuild: seccomp.h
WRAP arch/m68k/include/generated/asm/seccomp.h
UPD include/generated/utsrelease.h
in the build log.
None of the other archs do add seccomp.h to their include/asm/Kbuild
script. I'll leave it at v6 then.
Cheers,
Michael
