Hi Geert, On 23/06/21 7:35 pm, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
BTW, there was also "[PATCH] [WIP] selftests/seccomp: Add m68k support" https://lore.kernel.org/linux-m68k/alpine.DEB.2.21.2008261315050.25325@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ I kept on up-porting it, but haven't exercised it recently.
See attached for test results on my ARAnyM image (Laurent's qemu image, essentially).
Is that any different from what you got in your earlier tests? Cheers, Michael
sysctl: cannot stat /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable: No such file or directory sysctl: cannot stat /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_harden: No such file or directory Current BPF sysctl settings: Calibrating sample size for 15 seconds worth of syscalls ... Benchmarking 17652210 syscalls... 15.650000000 - 1.010000000 = 14640000000 (14.6s) getpid native: 829 ns 73.810000000 - 15.650000000 = 58160000000 (58.2s) getpid RET_ALLOW 1 filter (bitmap): 3294 ns 131.880000000 - 73.810000000 = 58070000000 (58.1s) getpid RET_ALLOW 2 filters (bitmap): 3289 ns 189.930000000 - 131.880000000 = 58050000000 (58.0s) getpid RET_ALLOW 3 filters (full): 3288 ns 247.960000000 - 189.930000000 = 58030000000 (58.0s) getpid RET_ALLOW 4 filters (full): 3287 ns Estimated total seccomp overhead for 1 bitmapped filter: 2465 ns Estimated total seccomp overhead for 2 bitmapped filters: 2460 ns Estimated total seccomp overhead for 3 full filters: 2459 ns Estimated total seccomp overhead for 4 full filters: 2458 ns Estimated seccomp entry overhead: 2470 ns Estimated seccomp per-filter overhead (last 2 diff): 18446744073709551615 ns Saw unexpected benchmark result. Try running again with more samples?
TAP version 13 1..87 # Starting 87 tests from 7 test cases. # RUN TRAP.dfl ... # dfl: Test exited normally instead of by signal (code: 0) # FAIL TRAP.dfl not ok 1 TRAP.dfl # RUN TRAP.ign ... # ign: Test exited normally instead of by signal (code: 0) # FAIL TRAP.ign not ok 2 TRAP.ign # RUN TRAP.handler ... # seccomp_bpf.c:1130:handler:Expected SIGSYS (31) == test (0) # seccomp_bpf.c:1141:handler:Expected __NR_getpid (20) == sigsys->_syscall (0) # seccomp_bpf.c:1143:handler:Expected 0 (0) != sigsys->_arch (0) # seccomp_bpf.c:1144:handler:Expected 0 (0) != (unsigned long)sigsys->_call_addr (0) # handler: Test failed at step #5 # FAIL TRAP.handler not ok 3 TRAP.handler # RUN precedence.allow_ok ... # OK precedence.allow_ok ok 4 precedence.allow_ok # RUN precedence.kill_is_highest ... # seccomp_bpf.c:1274:kill_is_highest:Expected 0 (0) == res (2034) # kill_is_highest: Test exited normally instead of by signal (code: 13) # FAIL precedence.kill_is_highest not ok 5 precedence.kill_is_highest # RUN precedence.kill_is_highest_in_any_order ... # seccomp_bpf.c:1301:kill_is_highest_in_any_order:Expected 0 (0) == syscall(__NR_getpid) (2035) # kill_is_highest_in_any_order: Test exited normally instead of by signal (code: 13) # FAIL precedence.kill_is_highest_in_any_order not ok 6 precedence.kill_is_highest_in_any_order # RUN precedence.trap_is_second ... # seccomp_bpf.c:1326:trap_is_second:Expected 0 (0) == syscall(__NR_getpid) (2036) # trap_is_second: Test exited normally instead of by signal (code: 12) # FAIL precedence.trap_is_second not ok 7 precedence.trap_is_second # RUN precedence.trap_is_second_in_any_order ... # seccomp_bpf.c:1351:trap_is_second_in_any_order:Expected 0 (0) == syscall(__NR_getpid) (2037) # trap_is_second_in_any_order: Test exited normally instead of by signal (code: 12) # FAIL precedence.trap_is_second_in_any_order not ok 8 precedence.trap_is_second_in_any_order # RUN precedence.errno_is_third ... # seccomp_bpf.c:1373:errno_is_third:Expected 0 (0) == syscall(__NR_getpid) (2038) # errno_is_third: Test failed at step #11 # FAIL precedence.errno_is_third not ok 9 precedence.errno_is_third # RUN precedence.errno_is_third_in_any_order ... # seccomp_bpf.c:1395:errno_is_third_in_any_order:Expected 0 (0) == syscall(__NR_getpid) (2039) # errno_is_third_in_any_order: Test failed at step #11 # FAIL precedence.errno_is_third_in_any_order not ok 10 precedence.errno_is_third_in_any_order # RUN precedence.trace_is_fourth ... # seccomp_bpf.c:1416:trace_is_fourth:Expected -1 (-1) == syscall(__NR_getpid) (2040) # trace_is_fourth: Test failed at step #10 # FAIL precedence.trace_is_fourth not ok 11 precedence.trace_is_fourth # RUN precedence.trace_is_fourth_in_any_order ... # seccomp_bpf.c:1437:trace_is_fourth_in_any_order:Expected -1 (-1) == syscall(__NR_getpid) (2041) # trace_is_fourth_in_any_order: Test failed at step #10 # FAIL precedence.trace_is_fourth_in_any_order not ok 12 precedence.trace_is_fourth_in_any_order # RUN precedence.log_is_fifth ... # OK precedence.log_is_fifth ok 13 precedence.log_is_fifth # RUN precedence.log_is_fifth_in_any_order ... # OK precedence.log_is_fifth_in_any_order ok 14 precedence.log_is_fifth_in_any_order # RUN TRACE_poke.read_has_side_effects ... # seccomp_bpf.c:1689:read_has_side_effects:Expected 0x1001 (4097) == self->poked (0) # read_has_side_effects: Test failed at step #5 # FAIL TRACE_poke.read_has_side_effects not ok 15 TRACE_poke.read_has_side_effects # RUN TRACE_poke.getpid_runs_normally ... # OK TRACE_poke.getpid_runs_normally ok 16 TRACE_poke.getpid_runs_normally # RUN TRACE_syscall.ptrace.negative_ENOSYS ... # seccomp_bpf.c:1907:negative_ENOSYS:Expected 0 (-1073525222) == ARCH_GETREGS(regs) (0) # OK TRACE_syscall.ptrace.negative_ENOSYS ok 17 TRACE_syscall.ptrace.negative_ENOSYS # RUN TRACE_syscall.ptrace.syscall_allowed ... # seccomp_bpf.c:1907:syscall_allowed:Expected 0 (-1073525222) == ARCH_GETREGS(regs) (0) # OK TRACE_syscall.ptrace.syscall_allowed ok 18 TRACE_syscall.ptrace.syscall_allowed # RUN TRACE_syscall.ptrace.syscall_redirected ... # seccomp_bpf.c:1907:syscall_redirected:Expected 0 (-1073656156) == ARCH_GETREGS(regs) (0) # seccomp_bpf.c:2171:syscall_redirected:Expected self->parent (2029) == syscall(__NR_getpid) (2052) # seccomp_bpf.c:2172:syscall_redirected:Expected self->mypid (2052) != syscall(__NR_getpid) (2052) # syscall_redirected: Test failed at step #9 # FAIL TRACE_syscall.ptrace.syscall_redirected not ok 19 TRACE_syscall.ptrace.syscall_redirected # RUN TRACE_syscall.ptrace.syscall_errno ... # seccomp_bpf.c:1907:syscall_errno:Expected 0 (-1073525222) == ARCH_GETREGS(regs) (0) # seccomp_bpf.c:2178:syscall_errno:Expected -(-3) (3) == errno (14) # syscall_errno: Test failed at step #9 # FAIL TRACE_syscall.ptrace.syscall_errno not ok 20 TRACE_syscall.ptrace.syscall_errno # RUN TRACE_syscall.ptrace.syscall_faked ... # seccomp_bpf.c:1907:syscall_faked:Expected 0 (-1073525222) == ARCH_GETREGS(regs) (0) # seccomp_bpf.c:2184:syscall_faked:Expected 45000 (45000) == syscall(221) (2056) # syscall_faked: Test failed at step #9 # FAIL TRACE_syscall.ptrace.syscall_faked not ok 21 TRACE_syscall.ptrace.syscall_faked # RUN TRACE_syscall.ptrace.skip_after ... # seccomp_bpf.c:1907:skip_after:Expected 0 (-1073525222) == ARCH_GETREGS(regs) (0) # seccomp_bpf.c:2208:skip_after:Expected -1 (-1) == syscall(__NR_getpid) (2058) # seccomp_bpf.c:2209:skip_after:Expected EPERM (1) == errno (0) # skip_after: Test failed at step #10 # FAIL TRACE_syscall.ptrace.skip_after not ok 22 TRACE_syscall.ptrace.skip_after # RUN TRACE_syscall.ptrace.kill_after ... # seccomp_bpf.c:1907:kill_after:Expected 0 (-1073525222) == ARCH_GETREGS(regs) (0) # seccomp_bpf.c:2232:kill_after:Expected self->mypid (2060) != syscall(__NR_getpid) (2060) # kill_after: Test exited normally instead of by signal (code: 10) # FAIL TRACE_syscall.ptrace.kill_after not ok 23 TRACE_syscall.ptrace.kill_after # RUN TRACE_syscall.seccomp.negative_ENOSYS ... # OK TRACE_syscall.seccomp.negative_ENOSYS ok 24 TRACE_syscall.seccomp.negative_ENOSYS # RUN TRACE_syscall.seccomp.syscall_allowed ... # OK TRACE_syscall.seccomp.syscall_allowed ok 25 TRACE_syscall.seccomp.syscall_allowed # RUN TRACE_syscall.seccomp.syscall_redirected ... # seccomp_bpf.c:2171:syscall_redirected:Expected self->parent (2029) == syscall(__NR_getpid) (2066) # seccomp_bpf.c:2172:syscall_redirected:Expected self->mypid (2066) != syscall(__NR_getpid) (2066) # syscall_redirected: Test failed at step #10 # FAIL TRACE_syscall.seccomp.syscall_redirected not ok 26 TRACE_syscall.seccomp.syscall_redirected # RUN TRACE_syscall.seccomp.syscall_errno ... # seccomp_bpf.c:2178:syscall_errno:Expected -(-3) (3) == errno (14) # syscall_errno: Test failed at step #10 # FAIL TRACE_syscall.seccomp.syscall_errno not ok 27 TRACE_syscall.seccomp.syscall_errno # RUN TRACE_syscall.seccomp.syscall_faked ... # seccomp_bpf.c:2184:syscall_faked:Expected 45000 (45000) == syscall(221) (2070) # syscall_faked: Test failed at step #10 # FAIL TRACE_syscall.seccomp.syscall_faked not ok 28 TRACE_syscall.seccomp.syscall_faked # RUN TRACE_syscall.seccomp.skip_after ... # seccomp_bpf.c:2208:skip_after:Expected -1 (-1) == syscall(__NR_getpid) (2072) # seccomp_bpf.c:2209:skip_after:Expected EPERM (1) == errno (0) # skip_after: Test failed at step #11 # FAIL TRACE_syscall.seccomp.skip_after not ok 29 TRACE_syscall.seccomp.skip_after # RUN TRACE_syscall.seccomp.kill_after ... # seccomp_bpf.c:2232:kill_after:Expected self->mypid (2074) != syscall(__NR_getpid) (2074) # kill_after: Test exited normally instead of by signal (code: 11) # FAIL TRACE_syscall.seccomp.kill_after not ok 30 TRACE_syscall.seccomp.kill_after # RUN TSYNC.siblings_fail_prctl ... # seccomp_bpf.c:2636:siblings_fail_prctl:Expected SIBLING_EXIT_FAILURE (195951310) == (long)status (195935983) # siblings_fail_prctl: Test failed at step #6 # FAIL TSYNC.siblings_fail_prctl not ok 31 TSYNC.siblings_fail_prctl # RUN TSYNC.two_siblings_with_ancestor ... # seccomp_bpf.c:2678:two_siblings_with_ancestor:Expected 0x0 (0) == (long)status (195935983) # seccomp_bpf.c:2680:two_siblings_with_ancestor:Expected 0x0 (0) == (long)status (195935983) # two_siblings_with_ancestor: Test failed at step #7 # FAIL TSYNC.two_siblings_with_ancestor not ok 32 TSYNC.two_siblings_with_ancestor # RUN TSYNC.two_sibling_want_nnp ... # OK TSYNC.two_sibling_want_nnp ok 33 TSYNC.two_sibling_want_nnp # RUN TSYNC.two_siblings_with_no_filter ... # seccomp_bpf.c:2744:two_siblings_with_no_filter:Expected 0x0 (0) == (long)status (195935983) # seccomp_bpf.c:2746:two_siblings_with_no_filter:Expected 0x0 (0) == (long)status (195935983) # two_siblings_with_no_filter: Test failed at step #6 # FAIL TSYNC.two_siblings_with_no_filter not ok 34 TSYNC.two_siblings_with_no_filter # RUN TSYNC.two_siblings_with_one_divergence ... # OK TSYNC.two_siblings_with_one_divergence ok 35 TSYNC.two_siblings_with_one_divergence # RUN TSYNC.two_siblings_with_one_divergence_no_tid_in_err ... # OK TSYNC.two_siblings_with_one_divergence_no_tid_in_err ok 36 TSYNC.two_siblings_with_one_divergence_no_tid_in_err # RUN TSYNC.two_siblings_not_under_filter ... # seccomp_bpf.c:2923:two_siblings_not_under_filter:Expected 0 (0) == (long)status (195935983) # two_siblings_not_under_filter: Test failed at step #9 # FAIL TSYNC.two_siblings_not_under_filter not ok 37 TSYNC.two_siblings_not_under_filter # RUN global.kcmp ... # seccomp_bpf.c:323:kcmp:Expected ret (-1) == 0 (0) # SKIP Kernel does not support kcmp() (missing CONFIG_KCMP?) # OK global.kcmp ok 38 # SKIP Kernel does not support kcmp() (missing CONFIG_KCMP?) # RUN global.mode_strict_support ... # OK global.mode_strict_support ok 39 global.mode_strict_support # RUN global.mode_strict_cannot_call_prctl ... # seccomp_bpf.c:349:mode_strict_cannot_call_prctl:Expected 0 (0) == true (1) # seccomp_bpf.c:350:mode_strict_cannot_call_prctl:Unreachable! # mode_strict_cannot_call_prctl: Test exited normally instead of by signal (code: 1) # FAIL global.mode_strict_cannot_call_prctl not ok 40 global.mode_strict_cannot_call_prctl # RUN global.no_new_privs_support ... # OK global.no_new_privs_support ok 41 global.no_new_privs_support # RUN global.mode_filter_support ... # OK global.mode_filter_support ok 42 global.mode_filter_support # RUN global.mode_filter_without_nnp ... # OK global.mode_filter_without_nnp ok 43 global.mode_filter_without_nnp # RUN global.filter_size_limits ... # OK global.filter_size_limits ok 44 global.filter_size_limits # RUN global.filter_chain_limits ... # OK global.filter_chain_limits ok 45 global.filter_chain_limits # RUN global.mode_filter_cannot_move_to_strict ... # OK global.mode_filter_cannot_move_to_strict ok 46 global.mode_filter_cannot_move_to_strict # RUN global.mode_filter_get_seccomp ... # OK global.mode_filter_get_seccomp ok 47 global.mode_filter_get_seccomp # RUN global.ALLOW_all ... # OK global.ALLOW_all ok 48 global.ALLOW_all # RUN global.empty_prog ... # OK global.empty_prog ok 49 global.empty_prog # RUN global.log_all ... # OK global.log_all ok 50 global.log_all # RUN global.unknown_ret_is_kill_inside ... # seccomp_bpf.c:609:unknown_ret_is_kill_inside:Expected 0 (0) == syscall(__NR_getpid) (2110) # seccomp_bpf.c:610:unknown_ret_is_kill_inside:getpid() shouldn't ever return # unknown_ret_is_kill_inside: Test exited normally instead of by signal (code: 2) # FAIL global.unknown_ret_is_kill_inside not ok 51 global.unknown_ret_is_kill_inside # RUN global.unknown_ret_is_kill_above_allow ... # seccomp_bpf.c:631:unknown_ret_is_kill_above_allow:Expected 0 (0) == syscall(__NR_getpid) (2111) # seccomp_bpf.c:632:unknown_ret_is_kill_above_allow:getpid() shouldn't ever return # unknown_ret_is_kill_above_allow: Test exited normally instead of by signal (code: 2) # FAIL global.unknown_ret_is_kill_above_allow not ok 52 global.unknown_ret_is_kill_above_allow # RUN global.KILL_all ... # KILL_all: Test exited normally instead of by signal (code: 0) # FAIL global.KILL_all not ok 53 global.KILL_all # RUN global.KILL_one ... # seccomp_bpf.c:678:KILL_one:Expected 0 (0) == syscall(__NR_getpid) (2113) # KILL_one: Test exited normally instead of by signal (code: 2) # FAIL global.KILL_one not ok 54 global.KILL_one # RUN global.KILL_one_arg_one ... # seccomp_bpf.c:714:KILL_one_arg_one:Expected 0 (0) == syscall(__NR_times, &fatal_address) (89022) # KILL_one_arg_one: Test exited normally instead of by signal (code: 2) # FAIL global.KILL_one_arg_one not ok 55 global.KILL_one_arg_one # RUN global.KILL_one_arg_six ... # KILL_one_arg_six: Test exited normally instead of by signal (code: 0) # FAIL global.KILL_one_arg_six not ok 56 global.KILL_one_arg_six # RUN global.KILL_thread ... # seccomp_bpf.c:844:KILL_thread:Expected SIBLING_EXIT_FAILURE (195951310) != (unsigned long)status (195951310) # seccomp_bpf.c:869:KILL_thread:Expected 0 (0) != WIFEXITED(status) (0) # KILL_thread: Test terminated by assertion # FAIL global.KILL_thread not ok 57 global.KILL_thread # RUN global.KILL_process ... # seccomp_bpf.c:844:KILL_process:Expected SIBLING_EXIT_FAILURE (195951310) != (unsigned long)status (195951310) # seccomp_bpf.c:889:KILL_process:Expected SIGSYS (31) == WTERMSIG(status) (6) # KILL_process: Test terminated by assertion # FAIL global.KILL_process not ok 58 global.KILL_process # RUN global.KILL_unknown ... # seccomp_bpf.c:844:KILL_unknown:Expected SIBLING_EXIT_FAILURE (195951310) != (unsigned long)status (195951310) # seccomp_bpf.c:910:KILL_unknown:Expected SIGSYS (31) == WTERMSIG(status) (6) # KILL_unknown: Test terminated by assertion # FAIL global.KILL_unknown not ok 59 global.KILL_unknown # RUN global.arg_out_of_range ... # OK global.arg_out_of_range ok 60 global.arg_out_of_range # RUN global.ERRNO_valid ... # seccomp_bpf.c:961:ERRNO_valid:Expected -1 (-1) == read(0, NULL, 0) (0) # seccomp_bpf.c:962:ERRNO_valid:Expected E2BIG (7) == errno (0) # ERRNO_valid: Test failed at step #2 # FAIL global.ERRNO_valid not ok 61 global.ERRNO_valid # RUN global.ERRNO_zero ... # OK global.ERRNO_zero ok 62 global.ERRNO_zero # RUN global.ERRNO_capped ... # seccomp_bpf.c:1001:ERRNO_capped:Expected -1 (-1) == read(0, NULL, 0) (0) # seccomp_bpf.c:1002:ERRNO_capped:Expected 4095 (4095) == errno (0) # ERRNO_capped: Test failed at step #2 # FAIL global.ERRNO_capped not ok 63 global.ERRNO_capped # RUN global.ERRNO_order ... # seccomp_bpf.c:1032:ERRNO_order:Expected -1 (-1) == read(0, NULL, 0) (0) # seccomp_bpf.c:1033:ERRNO_order:Expected 12 (12) == errno (0) # ERRNO_order: Test failed at step #4 # FAIL global.ERRNO_order not ok 64 global.ERRNO_order # RUN global.negative_ENOSYS ... # OK global.negative_ENOSYS ok 65 global.negative_ENOSYS # RUN global.seccomp_syscall ... # OK global.seccomp_syscall ok 66 global.seccomp_syscall # RUN global.seccomp_syscall_mode_lock ... # OK global.seccomp_syscall_mode_lock ok 67 global.seccomp_syscall_mode_lock # RUN global.detect_seccomp_filter_flags ... # OK global.detect_seccomp_filter_flags ok 68 global.detect_seccomp_filter_flags # RUN global.TSYNC_first ... # OK global.TSYNC_first ok 69 global.TSYNC_first # RUN global.syscall_restart ... # syscall_restart: Test terminated by timeout # FAIL global.syscall_restart not ok 70 global.syscall_restart # RUN global.filter_flag_log ... # seccomp_bpf.c:3012:syscall_restart:Expected 1 (1) == read(pipefd[0], &buf, 1) (0) # seccomp_bpf.c:3013:syscall_restart:Failed final read() from parent # seccomp_bpf.c:3015:syscall_restart:Expected '!' (33) == buf (46) # seccomp_bpf.c:3016:syscall_restart:Failed to get final data from read() # seccomp_bpf.c:3167:filter_flag_log:Expected 0 (0) == syscall(__NR_getpid) (2140) # filter_flag_log: Test exited normally instead of by signal (code: 3) # FAIL global.filter_flag_log not ok 71 global.filter_flag_log # RUN global.get_action_avail ... # OK global.get_action_avail ok 72 global.get_action_avail # RUN global.get_metadata ... # seccomp_bpf.c:3253:get_metadata:Expected sizeof(md) (16) == ret (-1) # SKIP Kernel does not support PTRACE_SECCOMP_GET_METADATA (missing CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE?) # OK global.get_metadata ok 73 # SKIP Kernel does not support PTRACE_SECCOMP_GET_METADATA (missing CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE?) # RUN global.user_notification_basic ... # seccomp_bpf.c:3325:user_notification_basic:Expected 0 (0) == WEXITSTATUS(status) (1) # user_notification_basic: Test terminated by timeout # FAIL global.user_notification_basic not ok 74 global.user_notification_basic # RUN global.user_notification_with_tsync ... # OK global.user_notification_with_tsync ok 75 global.user_notification_with_tsync # RUN global.user_notification_kill_in_middle ... # user_notification_kill_in_middle: Test terminated by timeout # FAIL global.user_notification_kill_in_middle not ok 76 global.user_notification_kill_in_middle # RUN global.user_notification_signal ... # user_notification_signal: Test terminated by timeout # FAIL global.user_notification_signal not ok 77 global.user_notification_signal # RUN global.user_notification_closed_listener ... # seccomp_bpf.c:3575:user_notification_closed_listener:Expected 0 (0) == WEXITSTATUS(status) (1) # user_notification_closed_listener: Test failed at step #3 # FAIL global.user_notification_closed_listener not ok 78 global.user_notification_closed_listener # RUN global.user_notification_child_pid_ns ... # seccomp_bpf.c:3588:user_notification_child_pid_ns:Expected unshare(CLONE_NEWUSER | CLONE_NEWPID) (-1) == 0 (0) # SKIP kernel missing CLONE_NEWUSER support # OK global.user_notification_child_pid_ns ok 79 # SKIP kernel missing CLONE_NEWUSER support # RUN global.user_notification_sibling_pid_ns ... # seccomp_bpf.c:3656:user_notification_sibling_pid_ns:Expected unshare(CLONE_NEWPID) (-1) == 0 (0) # user_notification_sibling_pid_ns: Test terminated by assertion # FAIL global.user_notification_sibling_pid_ns not ok 80 global.user_notification_sibling_pid_ns # RUN global.user_notification_fault_recv ... # seccomp_bpf.c:3641:user_notification_sibling_pid_ns:Expected unshare(CLONE_NEWPID) (-1) == 0 (0) # seccomp_bpf.c:3699:user_notification_fault_recv:Expected unshare(CLONE_NEWUSER) (-1) == 0 (0) # user_notification_fault_recv: Test terminated by assertion # FAIL global.user_notification_fault_recv not ok 81 global.user_notification_fault_recv # RUN global.seccomp_get_notif_sizes ... # OK global.seccomp_get_notif_sizes ok 82 global.seccomp_get_notif_sizes # RUN global.user_notification_continue ... # seccomp_bpf.c:3770:user_notification_continue:kcmp() syscall missing (test is less accurate) # user_notification_continue: Test terminated by timeout # FAIL global.user_notification_continue not ok 83 global.user_notification_continue # RUN global.user_notification_filter_empty ... # seccomp_bpf.c:3842:user_notification_filter_empty:Expected pid (-1) >= 0 (0) # user_notification_filter_empty: Test terminated by assertion # FAIL global.user_notification_filter_empty not ok 84 global.user_notification_filter_empty # RUN global.user_notification_filter_empty_threaded ... # seccomp_bpf.c:3896:user_notification_filter_empty_threaded:Expected pid (-1) >= 0 (0) # user_notification_filter_empty_threaded: Test terminated by assertion # FAIL global.user_notification_filter_empty_threaded not ok 85 global.user_notification_filter_empty_threaded # RUN global.user_notification_addfd ... # user_notification_addfd: Test terminated by timeout # FAIL global.user_notification_addfd not ok 86 global.user_notification_addfd # RUN global.user_notification_addfd_rlimit ... # user_notification_addfd_rlimit: Test terminated by timeout # FAIL global.user_notification_addfd_rlimit not ok 87 global.user_notification_addfd_rlimit # FAILED: 35 / 87 tests passed. # Totals: pass:32 fail:52 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:3 error:0
