On 05/11/2018 05:56 PM, Phillip Susi wrote:
On 5/11/2018 11:29 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Thanks for digging this up. I wasn't aware of this particular issue before
and I agree, this needs to be addressed. I hope that I didn't cause too
many DOS partitions to be misdetected. Sorry for the inconvenience if I
did. The Atari partition table code has been working great for
Debian/m68k so
far though.
I have seen at least one or two reports of Ubuntu users getting false
positives, and then I saw the bug report on the upstream parted bug
tracker the other day where someone claimed to have found a logical
error that caused atari_probe to return true when it shouldn't. I
finally realized it was not an error ( at least I think not ).
According to the documentation, p.43 [1], I think offset $01 should always
contain either "GEM", "BGM" or "XGM". They don't seem to be optional.
I guess adding those to atari_probe() should help improve the detection
quite a bit. But I would have to test that first.
I think I will at least move atari to be probed after all other labels
have failed.
This sounds like a reasonable thing to do until I have worked out
a patch to improve atari_probe().
Adrian
[1] https://people.debian.org/~glaubitz/Atari_HD_File_Sytem_Reference_Guide.pdf
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaubitz@xxxxxxxxxx
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
