Re: [PATCH 09/22] ncr5380: Adopt uniform DMA setup convention

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/15/2016 04:19 AM, Finn Thain wrote:

On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Hannes Reinecke wrote:

@@ -1555,8 +1555,7 @@ static int NCR5380_transfer_dma(struct S
 	NCR5380_read(RESET_PARITY_INTERRUPT_REG);
 	*data = d + c;
 	*count = 0;
-	*phase = NCR5380_read(STATUS_REG) & PHASE_MASK;
-	return foo;
+	return result;
 }
 
 /*

Don't you miss a phase update here?

I guess I missed explaining the change in the commit log.

The *phase assignment is redundant because after NCR5380_transfer_dma() 
returns control to NCR5380_information_transfer(), the latter routine then 
also returns, and so *phase is dead.

Right. Please add this to the commit message.

Otherwise:

Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxxx>

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		   Teamlead Storage & Networking
hare@xxxxxxx			               +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux S/390]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux