Re: [PATCH 09/22] ncr5380: Adopt uniform DMA setup convention

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/14/2016 05:27 AM, Finn Thain wrote:
Standardize the DMA setup hooks so that the DMA implementation in
atari_NCR5380.c can be reconciled with pseudo DMA implementation in
NCR5380.c.

Calls to NCR5380_dma_recv_setup() and NCR5380_dma_send_setup() return
a negative value on failure, zero on PDMA transfer success and a positive
byte count for DMA setup success.

This convention is not entirely new, but is now applied consistently.

Signed-off-by: Finn Thain <fthain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 drivers/scsi/NCR5380.c      |   21 ++++++++++-----------
 drivers/scsi/arm/cumana_1.c |   10 ++++++++--
 drivers/scsi/arm/oak.c      |    4 ++--
 drivers/scsi/atari_scsi.c   |    3 ---
 4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

Index: linux/drivers/scsi/NCR5380.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/drivers/scsi/NCR5380.c	2016-03-14 15:26:34.000000000 +1100
+++ linux/drivers/scsi/NCR5380.c	2016-03-14 15:26:37.000000000 +1100
@@ -1431,7 +1431,7 @@ static int NCR5380_transfer_dma(struct S
 	register unsigned char p = *phase;
 	register unsigned char *d = *data;
 	unsigned char tmp;
-	int foo;
+	int result;
 
 	if ((tmp = (NCR5380_read(STATUS_REG) & PHASE_MASK)) != p) {
 		*phase = tmp;
@@ -1505,9 +1505,9 @@ static int NCR5380_transfer_dma(struct S
  */
 
 	if (p & SR_IO) {
-		foo = NCR5380_dma_recv_setup(instance, d,
+		result = NCR5380_dma_recv_setup(instance, d,
 			hostdata->flags & FLAG_DMA_FIXUP ? c - 1 : c);
-		if (!foo && (hostdata->flags & FLAG_DMA_FIXUP)) {
+		if (!result && (hostdata->flags & FLAG_DMA_FIXUP)) {
 			/*
 			 * The workaround was to transfer fewer bytes than we
 			 * intended to with the pseudo-DMA read function, wait for
@@ -1525,19 +1525,19 @@ static int NCR5380_transfer_dma(struct S
 
 			if (NCR5380_poll_politely(instance, BUS_AND_STATUS_REG,
 			                          BASR_DRQ, BASR_DRQ, HZ) < 0) {
-				foo = -1;
+				result = -1;
 				shost_printk(KERN_ERR, instance, "PDMA read: DRQ timeout\n");
 			}
 			if (NCR5380_poll_politely(instance, STATUS_REG,
 			                          SR_REQ, 0, HZ) < 0) {
-				foo = -1;
+				result = -1;
 				shost_printk(KERN_ERR, instance, "PDMA read: !REQ timeout\n");
 			}
 			d[c - 1] = NCR5380_read(INPUT_DATA_REG);
 		}
 	} else {
-		foo = NCR5380_dma_send_setup(instance, d, c);
-		if (!foo && (hostdata->flags & FLAG_DMA_FIXUP)) {
+		result = NCR5380_dma_send_setup(instance, d, c);
+		if (!result && (hostdata->flags & FLAG_DMA_FIXUP)) {
 			/*
 			 * Wait for the last byte to be sent.  If REQ is being asserted for
 			 * the byte we're interested, we'll ACK it and it will go false.
@@ -1545,7 +1545,7 @@ static int NCR5380_transfer_dma(struct S
 			if (NCR5380_poll_politely2(instance,
 			     BUS_AND_STATUS_REG, BASR_DRQ, BASR_DRQ,
 			     BUS_AND_STATUS_REG, BASR_PHASE_MATCH, 0, HZ) < 0) {
-				foo = -1;
+				result = -1;
 				shost_printk(KERN_ERR, instance, "PDMA write: DRQ and phase timeout\n");
 			}
 		}
@@ -1555,8 +1555,7 @@ static int NCR5380_transfer_dma(struct S
 	NCR5380_read(RESET_PARITY_INTERRUPT_REG);
 	*data = d + c;
 	*count = 0;
-	*phase = NCR5380_read(STATUS_REG) & PHASE_MASK;
-	return foo;
+	return result;
 }
 
 /*

Don't you miss a phase update here?

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		   Teamlead Storage & Networking
hare@xxxxxxx			               +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux S/390]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux