On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Andreas Schwab <schwab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
+#else
+#define generic_rtc_ops *(struct rtc_class_ops*)NULL
+#endif
static int __init generic_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
{
struct rtc_device *rtc;
+ const struct rtc_class_ops *ops;
+
+ ops = dev_get_platdata(&dev->dev);
+ if (!ops)
+ ops = &generic_rtc_ops;
I hope no compiler version treats "&*(struct rtc_class_ops*)NULL" as
undefined behavior?
Yes, that is guaranteed, the operations cancel each other (6.5.3.2#3: If
the operand is the result of a unary * operator, neither that operator
nor the & operator is evaluated and the result is as if both were
omitted).
Thanks for confirming.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
