Re: [PATCH] m68k/mac: Make SCC reset work more reliably

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Tue, 14 Jan 2014, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:


I'm unsure about submitting this to -stable. I don't like the idea 
that the first debian user to boot a powerbook might see a crash 
(depending on bootloader etc). But not all stable trees carry df66834a 
which is a prerequisite. This patch is only applicable to 3.4.y and >= 
3.9.y. Can you nominate particular stable trees?

Sure, just add it to the comment, cfr. 
Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt:

Yes. I read the docs before I wrote.


 - If the patch requires other patches as prerequisites which can be 
   cherry-picked than this can be specified in the following format in 
   the sign-off area:

     Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 3.3.x: a1f84a3: sched: Check for idle
     Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 3.3.x: 1b9508f: sched: Rate-limit newidle
     Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 3.3.x: fd21073: sched: Fix affinity logic
     Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 3.3.x

I didn't want the commit to be cherry-picked as it's already there (under 
different commit IDs) in some stable trees.

The prerequisite commit is df66834a in mainline (merged in 3.10). It is 
known as f64747c9 in 3.9.y and 8cfd67a3 in 3.4.y.

I only checked the trees in linux-stable.git which is not exhaustive but 
there are some stable trees that don't have it at all.

Perhaps it would be best to request that the new patch only gets applied 
where the prerequisite patch was already in mainline, i.e. >= 3.10.

Finn


Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux S/390]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux