On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 08:03, <gerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Compiling for the m68knommu/68328 Palm/Pilot target you get:
AS arch/m68k/platform/68328/head-pilot.o
arch/m68k/platform/68328/head-pilot.S:37:23: fatal error: bootlogo.rh: No such file or directory
The Makefile contains rules to make the bootlogo.rh file from the C source
bootlogo.h. But it is missing a dependency that compiling head-pilot.S needs
bootlogo.rh.
Signed-off-by: Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/m68k/platform/68328/Makefile | 3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/m68k/platform/68328/Makefile b/arch/m68k/platform/68328/Makefile
index e4dfd8f..704e36d 100644
--- a/arch/m68k/platform/68328/Makefile
+++ b/arch/m68k/platform/68328/Makefile
@@ -16,6 +16,9 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ROM) += romvec.o
extra-y := head.o
extra-$(CONFIG_M68328) += bootlogo.rh head.o
+$(obj)/head-pilot.o: $(obj)/bootlogo.rh
+$(obj)/head-rom.o: $(obj)/bootlogo.rh
+
$(obj)/bootlogo.rh: $(src)/bootlogo.h
perl $(src)/bootlogo.pl < $(src)/bootlogo.h > $(obj)/bootlogo.rh
Nothing serious, you just made me wondering:
1. Any chance bootlogo.h can be generated from a more edit-friendly format,
cfr. drivers/video/logo/?
2. Why do you include the *.rh file from an assembler source file, instead of
including the *.h file from a C source file?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
