Hi Paul,
On 18/10/11 22:30, Paul Bolle wrote:
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 22:07 +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:
- dropped SOM5282EM too (discovered this while doing this second
version, my scripts aren't smart enough too catch it)
Hmm. I don't want to lose the SOM5282EM config option. Although it
isn't used inside the code it does let the configurer know that this
specific board is supported.
Isn't there another way? You're also adding a configuration option. This
means your configurer has to make a decision whether or not to enable
support for that board while this decision actually has no effect.
Yes, that is the idea. The configurer doesn't need to know it has
no effect (at least currently anyway). But they know that the board
is supported.
Apparently that support comes for free (I'm guessing once M528x support
is enabled, I haven't checked that). Wouldn't a comment do? Or adding a
line to some help text?
In the mean time I suppose you're willing to fix this part of my patch
yourself (ie, I don't have to redo this again).
Yes, thats fine, I will fix it and apply.
Geert: are you ok with the changes?
Thanks
Greg
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Ungerer -- Principal Engineer EMAIL: gerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx
SnapGear Group, McAfee PHONE: +61 7 3435 2888
8 Gardner Close FAX: +61 7 3217 5323
Milton, QLD, 4064, Australia WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
