Re: linux-2.6_2.6.39-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 19:38, Thorsten Glaser <tg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Geert Uytterhoeven dixit:

I folded it into your previous patch and pushed it out for 3.1.

Can you make a patch (series) on top of 3.0 and mail that to
debian-kernel asking for inclusion in the next 3.0 upload, on
the ground it’s been accepted upstream and fixes UI problems?

The two patches you need are

http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/geert/linux-m68k.git;a=commitdiff;h=1789c38726c2805563e9049dbc5d5253251761a7
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/geert/linux-m68k.git;a=commitdiff;h=10b2495b79eb8c2b6ec92b3ce1e5577f892f7821

which are both on my for-3.1/for-next branch:

http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/geert/linux-m68k.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/for-3.1

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux S/390]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux