On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 20:13, Thorsten Glaser <tg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Geert Uytterhoeven dixit:
Â3. If there's anything left that you really need, please tell us, so
"we" can get it in a good shape for v2.6.40.
OK. While I donât strictly need it, I can think of these:
â Reclaim chip RAM on Amiga
Nobody cares about 4 KiB of Chip RAM, especially not if you have to piss off the
Debian Kernel Team to have it now instead of in a few months :-)
â Reserve ST RAM early
Yeah, that's a valid one,
My (and probably lkml's) main issue there is that it introduces yet
another custom
allocator. Can we avoid that?
Iâm Bccâing the Debian Kernel person I was talking to, so we may
get an agreement. Iâll revisit your gitweb later then, to see
which patches you actually schedule for Linus, and try to get
them into Debian.
As for-2.6.39 got rebased in the mean time, you have to compare
m68k-v2.6.38 with m68k-queue to see what's (not yet) upstream.
And to back up Christian: keep up the good work!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
            Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
             Â Â -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
