On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 20:47, Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 12/23/09 9:37 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 14:01, Geert Uytterhoeven<geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 20:47, Maxim Kuvyrkov<maxim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
...
The question is which solution should we adopt. The patch I posted
fixes
all current problems with have on our hands. Andreas suggested to move
to
the generic layout of `struct siginfo' which will make future problems
less
likely, but this approach may need additional investigation.
If moving to the generic layout decreases the probability of future
problems,
it's the way to go.
Do we have a patch somewhere?
Here it is, the patch is rather simple.
I'm swamped at the moment, so I'll appreciate if someone verifies that the
kernel runs fine with this patch applied.
Verified and applied. Thanks a lot!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
