On Wed, 4 Mar 2009, Alessandro Zummo wrote:
On Wed, 4 Mar 2009 09:26:29 +0100 (CET)
Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks Paul, I wasn't aware of that thread!
Yes, this is almost the same. The only part I don't agree with is the move of
the creation of the platform device from arch-specific code to rtc-firmware.c,
as this makes autoloading the driver more difficult.
and it's also against a proper implementation of the device/driver model.
Seems like everybody but the RTC maintainer has an interest in having an RTC
class driver on top of [gs]et_rtc_time()... ;-)
That's because everyone is lazy :)
Seriously, if you want to handle it in the way we wrote
in the previous emails, it's ok for me.
OK, I will do so. Thanks!
With kind regards,
Geert Uytterhoeven
Software Architect
Sony Techsoft Centre Europe
The Corporate Village · Da Vincilaan 7-D1 · B-1935 Zaventem · Belgium
Phone: +32 (0)2 700 8453
Fax: +32 (0)2 700 8622
E-mail: Geert.Uytterhoeven@xxxxxxxxxxx
Internet: http://www.sony-europe.com/
A division of Sony Europe (Belgium) N.V.
VAT BE 0413.825.160 · RPR Brussels
Fortis · BIC GEBABEBB · IBAN BE41293037680010
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
