On Wed, 4 Mar 2009 09:26:29 +0100 (CET) Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks Paul, I wasn't aware of that thread! Yes, this is almost the same. The only part I don't agree with is the move of the creation of the platform device from arch-specific code to rtc-firmware.c, as this makes autoloading the driver more difficult.
and it's also against a proper implementation of the device/driver model.
Seems like everybody but the RTC maintainer has an interest in having an RTC class driver on top of [gs]et_rtc_time()... ;-)
That's because everyone is lazy :) Seriously, if you want to handle it in the way we wrote in the previous emails, it's ok for me. -- Best regards, Alessandro Zummo, Tower Technologies - Torino, Italy http://www.towertech.it -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
