On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 09:22:22PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 16:40:36 +0300 Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 08:33:54PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
...
Changes since 2.6.25-rc8-mm1:
...
+ext4-is-busted-on-m68k.patch
ext4 doesn't build on m68k
...
Is this due to the generic_find_next_le_bit compile error I reported as
2.6.25 regression (there seems to be some discussion recently how to
fix it - hopefully for 2.6.25) or is there even more breakage in -mm?
Yes, it's the bitops screwup.
I saw some related linux-ext4 email float past yesterday, so something
might be happening.
It would really help if we can get some m68k people to look at patch
i posted.
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.ext4/5944
-aneesh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
