On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 06:18:12PM +0100, Roman Zippel wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, Al Viro wrote:
Al, please stop sending m68k related patches directly to Linus, at least
send them to Andrew, so I at least get chance to comment on them.
recent as(1) doesn't think that . terminates a macro name, so
getuser.l is _not_ treated as invoking getuser with .l as the
first argument.
I still prefer to see this fixed in binutils...
How long does it take for you to realize that it won't happen?
I mean, really - a year? Two?
New as(1) sees
definition of gas_fscked.x
definition of gas_fscked (independent from gas_fscked.x)
invocation of gas_fscked.x
You might like such identifiers, but I don't want to see this in the m68k
source.
Feel free to rename. Frankly, seeing how little relation there is between
mainline and your tree, I don't see how that could be a problem for you.
Al, utterly sick and tired of that crap...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
