Re: [PATCH 1/4] coresight: cti: use device_* to iterate over device child nodes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/08/2024 11:37, Javier Carrasco wrote:
On 01/08/2024 11:20, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
On 01/08/2024 07:13, Javier Carrasco wrote:
Drop the manual access to the fwnode of the device to iterate over its
child nodes. `device_for_each_child_node` macro provides direct access
to the child nodes, and given that they are only required within the
loop, the scoped variant of the macro can be used.

Use the `device_for_each_child_node_scoped` macro to iterate over the
direct child nodes of the device.

Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@xxxxxxxxx>
---
   drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-platform.c | 10 +++-------
   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-platform.c b/
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-platform.c
index ccef04f27f12..d0ae10bf6128 100644
--- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-platform.c
+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-platform.c
@@ -416,20 +416,16 @@ static int
cti_plat_create_impdef_connections(struct device *dev,
                             struct cti_drvdata *drvdata)
   {
       int rc = 0;
-    struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = dev_fwnode(dev);
-    struct fwnode_handle *child = NULL;
   -    if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(fwnode))
+    if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev_fwnode(dev)))
           return -EINVAL;
   -    fwnode_for_each_child_node(fwnode, child) {
+    device_for_each_child_node_scoped(dev, child) {
           if (cti_plat_node_name_eq(child, CTI_DT_CONNS))
-            rc = cti_plat_create_connection(dev, drvdata,
-                            child);
+            rc = cti_plat_create_connection(dev, drvdata, child);
           if (rc != 0)
               break;

Don't we need to fwnode_handle_put(child) here, since we removed the
outer one ?

Suzuki


Hi Suzuki,

No, we don't need fwnode_handle_put(child) anymore because the scoped
variant of the macro is used.

Ah, apologies, was looking at the non-scoped version. I will queue this.

Suzuki

Best regards,
Javier Carrasco





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux