On 01/08/2024 14:39, Lee Jones wrote: > On Mon, 29 Jul 2024, Javier Carrasco wrote: > >> On 25/07/2024 18:28, Lee Jones wrote: >>> On Sun, 21 Jul 2024 17:19:00 +0200, Javier Carrasco wrote: >>>> This series aims to clarify the use cases of: >>>> >>>> - device_for_each_child_node[_scoped]() >>>> - fwnode_for_each_available_child_node[_scoped]() >>>> >>>> to access firmware nodes. >>>> >>>> [...] >>> >>> Applied, thanks! >>> >>> [3/6] leds: bd2606mvv: fix device child node usage in bd2606mvv_probe() >>> commit: 75d2a77327c4917bb66163eea0374bb749428e9c >>> [4/6] leds: is31fl319x: use device_for_each_child_node_scoped() to access child nodes >>> commit: 0f5a3feb60aba5d74f0b655cdff9c35aca03e81b >>> [5/6] leds: pca995x: use device_for_each_child_node() to access device child nodes >>> (no commit info) >>> >>> -- >>> Lee Jones [李琼斯] >>> >> >> Hi Lee, >> >> could you please tell me where you applied them? I rebased onto >> linux-next to prepare for v3, and these patches are still added on top >> of it. Can I find them in some leds/ branch? Thank you. > > Sorry, I was side-tracked before pushing. > > Pushed now. They should be in -next tomorrow. > Thanks, I see [3/6] leds: bd2606mvv: fix device child node usage in bd2606mvv_probe() [4/6] leds: is31fl319x: use device_for_each_child_node_scoped() to access child nodes applied to -next, but [5/6] leds: pca995x: use device_for_each_child_node() to access device child nodes has not been applied yet.
