Re: [PATCH v5 RESEND 1/6] platform: x86-android-tablets: other: Add swnode for Xiaomi pad2 indicator LED

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 9:58 AM Kate Hsuan <hpa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 3:30 AM Andy Shevchenko
> <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 24, 2024 at 5:02 PM Kate Hsuan <hpa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

...

> > > +/* main fwnode for ktd2026 */
> > > +static const struct software_node ktd2026_node = {
> > > +       .name = "ktd2026"
> >
> > Leave a comma, this is not a terminator.
> >
> > > +};
> >
> > When I asked about the name I relied on the fact that you have an idea
> > how it works. So, assuming my understanding is correct, this platform
> > may not have more than a single LED of this type. Dunno if we need a
> > comment about this.
>
> I'll make a comment to describe the configuration.
> This LED controller can be configured to an RGB LED like this. Also,
> it can be configured as three single-color (RGB) LEDs to show red,
> green, and blue only.
> I think the name can be "ktd2026-multi-color". Is it good for you?

My point here is that the name is static and if you have more than one
LED in the system, the second one won't be registered due to sysfs
name collisions. Question here is how many of these types of LEDs are
possible on the platform? If more than one, the name has to be
dropped. Writing this I think a comment would be good to have in any
case.

...

> > > +static int __init xiaomi_mipad2_init(void)
> > > +{
> > > +       return software_node_register_node_group(ktd2026_node_group);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void xiaomi_mipad2_exit(void)
> >
> > __exit ?
> No need.
> x86-andriod-tablet is based on platform_driver and platform_device so
> it doesn't need __exit.
>
> I put __exit and the compiler complained about the warning.
> ===
> WARNING: modpost:
> drivers/platform/x86/x86-android-tablets/x86-android-tablets: section
> mismatch in reference: xiaomi_mipad2_info+0x50 (section: .init.rodata)
> -> xiaomi_mipad2_exit (section: .exit.text)
> ===

This is interesting. Why then do we call them symmetrically?

Hans, do we need to have anything here been amended?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux