On 11/03/24 19:02, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Sun, Mar 10, 2024, at 21:22, Chris Packham wrote: >> On 8/03/24 23:34, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>> On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 12:19 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> On Fri, Mar 8, 2024, at 10:56, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>>>> On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 9:36 AM Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>> Normally, this patch should be taken in mvebu and then merged by >>>>>> arm-soc. However, I haven't seen any other patch touching this file (so >>>>>> no risk of merge conflict) and I think it's too late for me to make a >>>>>> new pull request to arm-soc. So I'm not against it being taken with the >>>>>> rest of the patches. However, I think it would be a good idea to see >>>>>> what Arnd thinks about it. >> FYI ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f arch/arm/boot/dts/marvell isn't >> picking up Arnd should it? > No, as Gregory writes, the intended way for platform specific > patches is to go through the maintainer for that platform, > in this case him, who then sends pull requests to me. > > Since it was late in the merge window, he suggested skipping > this step as an exception, which is something we can always do > if there is an important reason, just like you skip can all > maintainers and go directly to Linus if necessary, but the > maintainers file only documents the normal case. OK thanks for the clarification. I don't think there is any reason to rush this. I'll send a new series for this DTS change and one other that I have for the x530 via Gregory and it can come through for either 6.9 or 6.10.
