Re: [net-next PATCH v6 16/16] arm: mvebu: dt: Add PHY LED support for 370-rd WAN port

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 10:31:16AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Mon 2023-03-27 16:10:31, Christian Marangi wrote:
> > From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx>
> > 
> > The WAN port of the 370-RD has a Marvell PHY, with one LED on
> > the front panel. List this LED in the device tree.
> 
> > @@ -135,6 +136,19 @@ &mdio {
> >  	pinctrl-names = "default";
> >  	phy0: ethernet-phy@0 {
> >  		reg = <0>;
> > +		leds {
> > +			#address-cells = <1>;
> > +			#size-cells = <0>;
> > +
> > +			led@0 {
> > +				reg = <0>;
> > +				label = "WAN";
> > +				color = <LED_COLOR_ID_WHITE>;
> > +				function = LED_FUNCTION_LAN;
> > +				function-enumerator = <1>;
> > +				linux,default-trigger = "netdev";
> > +			};
> 
> /sys/class/leds/WAN is not acceptable.

As i said here, that is not what it gets called:

https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/aa2d0a8b-b98b-4821-9413-158be578e8e0@xxxxxxx/T/#m6c72bd355df3fcf8babc0d01dd6bf2697d069407

> It can be found in /sys/class/leds/f1072004.mdio-mii:00:WAN. But when
> we come to using it for ledtrig-netdev, the user is more likely to follow
> /sys/class/net/eth0/phydev/leds/f1072004.mdio-mii\:00\:WAN/

Is that acceptable?

What are the acceptance criteria?

     Andrew



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux