On Friday 19 August 2022 10:42:22 Pali Rohár wrote: > On Friday 19 August 2022 11:38:29 Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On 19/08/2022 11:08, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > >>> Although the question is - where is the user of it? > > >> > > >> I was planning to send updated powerpc DTS files with these > > >> register-bit-led definitions after accepting dt bindings. > > > > > > We need device tree people to ack them, first. But a note saying "this > > > is for Turris Omnia router" would be welcome. > > > > In general the process is one of: > > 1. Send DT bindings with driver and DTS changes, > > 2. Send DT bindings with driver in one patchset, DTS in second but you > > mention the dependency. > > > > You should not wait with DTS till bindings got accepted. Why? Because > > for example we do not want bindings for stuff which never is going to be > > upstreamed (with several exceptions, e.g. for other systems). Also > > because we want to be able to compare bindings with your DTS > > implementing them, so we are sure you described everything (especially > > that you said running one command to install dtchema and second command > > to make the check is not possible in your system). > > > > Without DTS here how can anyone be sure your DTS actually follows the > > bindings? > > > > Best regards, > > Krzysztof > > Well, last time I was told that first needs to be accepted bindings > documentation and then device tree files. So I did it like this. And now > it is again feasible and different steps and ordering is needed... > Sorry I cannot known all requirements which are moreover changing every > day. Here it is: https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/20220819084433.26011-1-pali@xxxxxxxxxx/
