Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: leds: lp50xx: fix LED children names

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 24/06/2022 19:31, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 24/06/2022 19:26, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 13:13:25 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> The lp50xx LEDs expects to have single-color LED children with unit
>>> addresses.  This is required by the driver and provided by existing
>>> DTSes.  Fix the binding to match actual usage.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Fixes: dce1452301e7 ("dt: bindings: lp50xx: Introduce the lp50xx family of RGB drivers")
>>> ---
>>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-lp50xx.yaml | 8 +++++++-
>>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>
>> My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
>> on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
>>
>> yamllint warnings/errors:
>>
>> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
>> /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-lp50xx.example.dtb: led-controller@14: multi-led@2:#size-cells:0:0: 0 was expected
>> 	From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-lp50xx.yaml
>>
> 
> This is expected and fixed in:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220607075247.58048-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx/
> 
> I did not combine this patch with above patchset because this one is a
> fix and might be backported to stable.
> 

Anyone willing to pick this up? This is a fix.

Best regards,
Krzysztof



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux