Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: leds: lp50xx: fix LED children names

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 24/06/2022 19:26, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 13:13:25 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> The lp50xx LEDs expects to have single-color LED children with unit
>> addresses.  This is required by the driver and provided by existing
>> DTSes.  Fix the binding to match actual usage.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Fixes: dce1452301e7 ("dt: bindings: lp50xx: Introduce the lp50xx family of RGB drivers")
>> ---
>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-lp50xx.yaml | 8 +++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
> 
> My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
> on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
> 
> yamllint warnings/errors:
> 
> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
> /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-lp50xx.example.dtb: led-controller@14: multi-led@2:#size-cells:0:0: 0 was expected
> 	From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-lp50xx.yaml
> 

This is expected and fixed in:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220607075247.58048-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx/

I did not combine this patch with above patchset because this one is a
fix and might be backported to stable.

Best regards,
Krzysztof



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux