Re: [PATCH v11 3/5] dt-bindings: leds: Add LED_FUNCTION_MOONLIGHT definitions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> 於 2020年12月2日 週三 下午8:23寫道:
>
> On Wed 2020-12-02 18:46:49, Gene Chen wrote:
> > From: Gene Chen <gene_chen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Add LED_FUNCTION_MOONLIGHT definitions
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gene Chen <gene_chen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Acked-by: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  include/dt-bindings/leds/common.h | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/leds/common.h b/include/dt-bindings/leds/common.h
> > index 52b619d..843e65d 100644
> > --- a/include/dt-bindings/leds/common.h
> > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/leds/common.h
> > @@ -78,6 +78,7 @@
> >  #define LED_FUNCTION_INDICATOR "indicator"
> >  #define LED_FUNCTION_LAN "lan"
> >  #define LED_FUNCTION_MAIL "mail"
> > +#define LED_FUNCTION_MOONLIGHT "moonlight"
>
> There's "torch" function that should be used for this. I guess comment
> should be added with explanation what exactly that is and how should
> the LED be named.
>

According to mail, 11/25 "Re: [PATCH v7 2/5] dt-bindings: leds: Add
LED_COLOR_ID_MOONLIGHT definitions",
The Moonlight LED is LED which maximum current more than torch, but
less than flash. Such as front camera fill light.
I think our channel is moonlight, not torch.
I will add this description to comment.
We can't exactly define moonlight current level, because every vendor
has their own specification.

> Best regards,
>                                                                 Pavel
> --
> http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux