On Thu, 01 Oct 2020 01:46:32 +0200, Alexander Dahl wrote: > The example was adapted in the following ways: > > - make use of the now supported 'function' and 'color' properties > - remove pwm nodes, those are documented elsewhere > - tweake node names to be matched by new dtschema rules > > License was discussed with the original author. > > Suggested-by: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Dahl <post@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@xxxxxx> > --- > > Notes: > v5 -> v6: > * removed pwm nodes from example (Rob) > * renamed led-controller node in example (Rob) > > v4 -> v5: > * updated based on feedback by Rob Herring > * removed Acked-by > > v3 -> v4: > * added Cc to original author of the binding > > v2 -> v3: > * changed license identifier to recommended one > * added Acked-by > > v2: > * added this patch to series (Suggested-by: Jacek Anaszewski) > > .../devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-pwm.txt | 50 ------------- > .../devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-pwm.yaml | 70 +++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-) > delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-pwm.txt > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-pwm.yaml > My bot found errors running 'make dt_binding_check' on your patch: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml: pwmleds: 'panel' does not match any of the regexes: '^led(-[0-9a-f]+)?$', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+' From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-pwm.yaml See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1374765 If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above error(s), then make sure dt-schema is up to date: pip3 install git+https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema.git@master --upgrade Please check and re-submit.
